Feiyang Xu (Amber)
Logo PhD Candidate, Information System, Tilburg University, the Netherlands

Feiyang (Amber) Xu is currently a PhD candidate in the Information Systems & Operations Management department at TiSEM.

Her research interests lie in digital platforms and artificial intelligence, with a focus on technological innovation and strategic management. One theme of her work examines the impact of generative AI assistants on online communities of open-source projects, where users share knowledge and help each other maintain the integrity of the projects.


Education
  • Tilburg University
    Tilburg University
    Information System
    Ph.D. Student
    May. 2024 - present
  • Utrecht University
    Utrecht University
    M.A. in Energy Science
    Sep. 2016 - Jul. 2018
  • Waseda University
    Waseda University
    B.S. in Civil and Environmental Engineering
    Sep. 2011 - Jul. 2016
Honors & Awards
  • CIST Best Student Paper Nomination
    2025
  • Tilburg CentER PhD Scholarship
    2024
  • Utrecht Excellent Scholarship (covers the tuition fee plus living expense)
    2016
  • Okuma Memorial Scholarship (covers the tuition fee)
    2011
News
2026
I will attend the conference Digital Economy Workshop Athens in March, see you in Athens!
Jan 31
2025
I heard that the SCECR 2026 conference will be held in Tokyo. I will do my best to start a new research project and have my paper accepted at SCECR 2026.
Nov 02
I will attend the conference CIST 2025, see you in Atlanta!
Oct 19
Selected Publications View All
AI-assisted Programming May Decrease the Productivity of Experienced Developers by Increasing Maintenance Burden
AI-assisted Programming May Decrease the Productivity of Experienced Developers by Increasing Maintenance Burden

Feiyang Xu, Poonacha K. Medappa, Murat M. Tunc, Martijn Vroegindeweij, Jan C. Fransoo

Conference on Information Systems and Technology (CIST) 2025

Generative AI solutions like GitHub Copilot have been shown to increase the productivity of software developers. Yet prior work remains unclear on the quality of code produced and the challenges of maintaining it in software projects. If quality declines as volume grows, experienced developers face increased workloads reviewing and reworking code from less-experienced contributors. We analyze developer activity in Open Source Software (OSS) projects following the introduction of GitHub Copilot. We find that productivity indeed increases. However, the increase in productivity is primarily driven by less-experienced (peripheral) developers. We also find that code written after the adoption of AI requires more rework. Importantly, the added rework burden falls on the more experienced (core) developers, who review 6.5% more code after Copilot’s introduction, but show a 19% drop in their original code productivity. More broadly, this finding raises caution that productivity gains of AI may mask the growing burden of maintenance on a shrinking pool of experts.

AI-assisted Programming May Decrease the Productivity of Experienced Developers by Increasing Maintenance Burden

Feiyang Xu, Poonacha K. Medappa, Murat M. Tunc, Martijn Vroegindeweij, Jan C. Fransoo

Conference on Information Systems and Technology (CIST) 2025

Generative AI solutions like GitHub Copilot have been shown to increase the productivity of software developers. Yet prior work remains unclear on the quality of code produced and the challenges of maintaining it in software projects. If quality declines as volume grows, experienced developers face increased workloads reviewing and reworking code from less-experienced contributors. We analyze developer activity in Open Source Software (OSS) projects following the introduction of GitHub Copilot. We find that productivity indeed increases. However, the increase in productivity is primarily driven by less-experienced (peripheral) developers. We also find that code written after the adoption of AI requires more rework. Importantly, the added rework burden falls on the more experienced (core) developers, who review 6.5% more code after Copilot’s introduction, but show a 19% drop in their original code productivity. More broadly, this finding raises caution that productivity gains of AI may mask the growing burden of maintenance on a shrinking pool of experts.

All publications